WoRMS name details
Limopsis (Versipella) Iredale, 1931
511164 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:511164)
alternative representation
Subgenus
Versipella Iredale, 1931 · unaccepted
- Species Limopsis (Versipella) soboles Iredale, 1931 represented as Limopsis soboles (Iredale, 1931)
- Species Limopsis (Versipella) tenisoni Tenison Woods, 1878 represented as Limopsis tenisoni Tenison Woods, 1878
marine
feminine
(of Versipella Iredale, 1931) Iredale, T. (1931). Australian molluscan notes. No I. <em>Records of the Australian Museum.</em> 18(4): 201-235, pls. 22-25. [21 June 1931]., available online at http://australianmuseum.net.au/Uploads/Journals/17196/725_complete.pdf
page(s): 204, 232 [details]
page(s): 204, 232 [details]
Taxonomy Huber (2015: 370) wrote "The application of genera [among Limopsidae] is therefore unsubstantiated and premature... for...
Taxonomy Huber (2015: 370) wrote "The application of genera [among Limopsidae] is therefore unsubstantiated and premature... for the time being the subgeneric a approach is upheld, representing the best solution currently available", and this is followed herein, notwithstanding the contrary view of Janssen (2015) who treated all the currently accepted subgenera as full genera (and was followed in WoRMS at one time). Coan & Valentich-Scott (2012: 208) also concur in that " [Limopsis] has been split into several groups (...) but these characters are mutable and numerous intergrades occur." [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Limopsis (Versipella) Iredale, 1931. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=511164 on 2024-04-18
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Versipella Iredale, 1931) Iredale, T. (1931). Australian molluscan notes. No I. <em>Records of the Australian Museum.</em> 18(4): 201-235, pls. 22-25. [21 June 1931]., available online at http://australianmuseum.net.au/Uploads/Journals/17196/725_complete.pdf
page(s): 204, 232 [details]
basis of record Huber, M. (2010). <i>Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world's marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research</i>. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. (look up in IMIS) [details]
page(s): 204, 232 [details]
basis of record Huber, M. (2010). <i>Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world's marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research</i>. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. (look up in IMIS) [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Huber (2015: 370) wrote "The application of genera [among Limopsidae] is therefore unsubstantiated and premature... for the time being the subgeneric a approach is upheld, representing the best solution currently available", and this is followed herein, notwithstanding the contrary view of Janssen (2015) who treated all the currently accepted subgenera as full genera (and was followed in WoRMS at one time). Coan & Valentich-Scott (2012: 208) also concur in that " [Limopsis] has been split into several groups (...) but these characters are mutable and numerous intergrades occur." [details]
