WoRMS taxon details

Phakellia stuartridleyi Van Soest & Hooper, 2020

1424193  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1424193)

accepted
Species
Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886 · unaccepted (preoccupied)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Van Soest, R.W.M.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Butler, P.J. (2020). Every sponge its own name: removing Porifera homonyms. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4745(1): 1-93., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4745.1.1
page(s): 44 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
Nomenclature We cite here Van Soest et al.'s (2020:43-44) explanation for the nomen novum.
Removal of homonymy between Phakellia...  
Nomenclature We cite here Van Soest et al.'s (2020:43-44) explanation for the nomen novum.
Removal of homonymy between Phakellia papyracea Carter, 1886 = Echinoclathria leporina (Lamarck, 1814) and Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886.
1. Phakellia papyracea Carter, 1886: 379 (type locality Port Western, Southeast Australia). This species was reassigned to the synonymy of Echinoclathria leporina (Lamarck, 1814: 444) by Hooper & Wiedenmayer (1994: 280). It was described in the same volume as Phakellia papyracea sensu Ridley & Dendy, 1886 but on p. 478, making it a senior homonym on the basis of ICZN Art. Rec. 69A.10 (page precedence).
2. Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886: 478 (type locality Prince Edward and Crozet Isands, Southern Indian Ocean). Lambe (1893: 76) used this name for an unnamed ‘variety’ found in the Canadian Arctic. The variety not only was reported at a large distance from the type locality but also had considerably different shape as well as much smaller spicules. Subsequently, Hentschel (1929) decided Lambe’s variety deserved a new name, Phakellia beringensis Hentschel, 1929: 975. Hentschel’s species was reassigned by Hooper (1996: 482) to genus Echinoclathria Carter, 1885: 355 as E. beringensis, but this did not concern Ridley & Dendy’s Phakellia papyracea, only the variety of Lambe. So far, Phakellia papyracea sensu Ridley & Dendy remains undiscussed and the World Porifera Database accepted the combination as valid. It is a junior primary homonym and needs to be renamed, regardless of its true genus identity (ICZN Art. 60.3).
3. Summary: Echinoclathria papyracea (Carter, 1886) is to be maintained as a junior synonym of Echinoclathria leporina (Lamarck, 1814) (ICZN Art. 57.2). Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886 is a junior primary homonym without known synonyms and thus needed to be renamed (ICZN Art. 60.3). To remove the homonymy, Phakellia stuartridleyi nom. nov. was proposed, named after Stuart Ridley. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Phakellia stuartridleyi Van Soest & Hooper, 2020. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1424193 on 2024-04-23
Date
action
by
2020-03-06 10:15:15Z
created
2021-03-15 09:46:14Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Van Soest, R.W.M.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Butler, P.J. (2020). Every sponge its own name: removing Porifera homonyms. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4745(1): 1-93., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4745.1.1
page(s): 44 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

original description  (of Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886) Ridley, S.O.; Dendy, A. (1886). Preliminary report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. Challenger. Part I. <em>Annals and Magazine of Natural History.</em> 18: 325-351, 470-493.
page(s): 478 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

original description  (of Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886) Ridley, S.O.; Dendy, A. (1887). Report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. 'Challenger' during the years 1873-76. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology.</em> 20 (part 59): i-lxviii, 1-275, pl. 1-51, 1 map., available online at http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-59/README.htm
page(s): 172 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Syntype (of Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886) BMNH 1887.5.2.29, geounit Crozet Islands [details]
Syntype (of Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886) BMNH 1887.5.2.52, geounit Prince Edward Islands [details]
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature We cite here Van Soest et al.'s (2020:43-44) explanation for the nomen novum.
Removal of homonymy between Phakellia papyracea Carter, 1886 = Echinoclathria leporina (Lamarck, 1814) and Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886.
1. Phakellia papyracea Carter, 1886: 379 (type locality Port Western, Southeast Australia). This species was reassigned to the synonymy of Echinoclathria leporina (Lamarck, 1814: 444) by Hooper & Wiedenmayer (1994: 280). It was described in the same volume as Phakellia papyracea sensu Ridley & Dendy, 1886 but on p. 478, making it a senior homonym on the basis of ICZN Art. Rec. 69A.10 (page precedence).
2. Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886: 478 (type locality Prince Edward and Crozet Isands, Southern Indian Ocean). Lambe (1893: 76) used this name for an unnamed ‘variety’ found in the Canadian Arctic. The variety not only was reported at a large distance from the type locality but also had considerably different shape as well as much smaller spicules. Subsequently, Hentschel (1929) decided Lambe’s variety deserved a new name, Phakellia beringensis Hentschel, 1929: 975. Hentschel’s species was reassigned by Hooper (1996: 482) to genus Echinoclathria Carter, 1885: 355 as E. beringensis, but this did not concern Ridley & Dendy’s Phakellia papyracea, only the variety of Lambe. So far, Phakellia papyracea sensu Ridley & Dendy remains undiscussed and the World Porifera Database accepted the combination as valid. It is a junior primary homonym and needs to be renamed, regardless of its true genus identity (ICZN Art. 60.3).
3. Summary: Echinoclathria papyracea (Carter, 1886) is to be maintained as a junior synonym of Echinoclathria leporina (Lamarck, 1814) (ICZN Art. 57.2). Phakellia papyracea Ridley & Dendy, 1886 is a junior primary homonym without known synonyms and thus needed to be renamed (ICZN Art. 60.3). To remove the homonymy, Phakellia stuartridleyi nom. nov. was proposed, named after Stuart Ridley. [details]