| Intro | | Search taxa | | Browse taxa | | Distributions | | Terminology | | References | | Statistics | | Online sources | | Tutorial | | Log in |
WoRMS taxon detailsIphione Kinberg, 1856
206125 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:206125)
accepted
Genus
Polynoe muricata Lamarck, 1818 accepted as Iphione muricata (Lamarck, 1818) (type by subsequent designation)
Norepa [auct. misspelling for Norepea] · unaccepted (misspelling of Norepea Baird, 1865)
Norepea Baird, 1865 · unaccepted (subjective synonym)
marine,
recent only
Kinberg, J.G.H. (1856). Nya slägten och arter af Annelider, Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhhandlingar Stockholm, 12 (9-10), 381-388 [read 1855; printed 1856]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15970133
page(s): 383 [details]
Note Kinberg created Iphione for his new species I....
Type species Kinberg created Iphione for his new species I. ovata and for Polynoe muricata Lamarck. The type species is Polynoe muricata 'Savigny 1818' [=Lamarck] in Fauchald (1977), but Iphione ovata Kinberg in Hartman (1959). Pettibone (1986:2) concluded that Baird (1865) had subsequently assigned the type species status to Polynoe muricata in a statement that the 'typical species' is the Polynoe muricata of Savigny (referring to Savigny's later more detailed description than in Lamarck). However, in Article 67.5 the ICZN Code explicitly rules out such designations based on the word 'typical'. Thus Baird (1865) did not designate the type species of Iphione. A type species concept for a genus was introduced by the Strickland code (1878). Thus subsequent designations of the type of a genus earlier than 1878 are unlikely. It is possible Hartman (1959) is the first to designate a type (as Iphione ovata), but it is unknown why she did this when I. ovata was often treated as a synonym of the more often reported I. muricata, and it is equally possible she was simply repeating an earlier usage. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Iphione Kinberg, 1856. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=206125 on 2025-05-06
Date action by 2000-08-01 09:52:29Z changed Vermaercke, Sigrid
Nomenclatureoriginal description
Kinberg, J.G.H. (1856). Nya slägten och arter af Annelider, Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhhandlingar Stockholm, 12 (9-10), 381-388 [read 1855; printed 1856]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15970133 page(s): 383 [details] original description (of Norepea Baird, 1865) Baird, William. (1865). Contributions towards a monograph of the species of <i>Annelides</i> belonging to the <i>Aphroditacea</i>, containing a list of the known species, and a description of some new species contained in the National Collection of the British Museum. <em>The Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology.</em> 8(31-32): 172-202., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31601914 page(s): 200; note: for Polynoe peronea Schmarda, 1861 from Ceylon. Said to be similar to Polynoe (Iphione) muricata of Savigny [details]  Taxonomytaxonomy source
Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I.; Piotrowski, Christina N.; Paulay, Gustav. (2024). Revision of Iphione Kinberg, 1856 (Annelida, Aphroditiformia, Iphionidae). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5548(1): 1-84., available online at https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5548.1.1 note: Genus Iphione revision [details] Available for editors  [request]Identification resourceidentification resource
Piotrowski, Christina 2014. A new scaleworm, Iphione malifera (Polychaeta: Iphionidae) from a coral reef in the Philippine Islands. The Coral Triangle: The 2011 Hearst Philippine Biodiversity Expedition. Williams, G.C.; Gosliner, T.M. eds. California Academy of Sciences. p. 155-164 , available online at http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/izg/Hearst%20Biodiversity%20vol%20XWeb%20fileLRComp.pdf page(s): 162 key to valid species [details] Otheradditional source
Baird, William. (1865). Contributions towards a monograph of the species of <i>Annelides</i> belonging to the <i>Aphroditacea</i>, containing a list of the known species, and a description of some new species contained in the National Collection of the British Museum. <em>The Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology.</em> 8(31-32): 172-202., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31601914 [details]
additional source Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details] additional source Day, J. H. (1967). [Errantia] A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Part 1. Errantia. British Museum (Natural History), London. pp. vi, 1–458, xxix., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/8596 [details]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Type species Kinberg created Iphione for his new species I. ovata and for Polynoe muricata Lamarck. The type species is Polynoe muricata 'Savigny 1818' [=Lamarck] in Fauchald (1977), but Iphione ovata Kinberg in Hartman (1959). Pettibone (1986:2) concluded that Baird (1865) had subsequently assigned the type species status to Polynoe muricata in a statement that the 'typical species' is the Polynoe muricata of Savigny (referring to Savigny's later more detailed description than in Lamarck). However, in Article 67.5 the ICZN Code explicitly rules out such designations based on the word 'typical'. Thus Baird (1865) did not designate the type species of Iphione. A type species concept for a genus was introduced by the Strickland code (1878). Thus subsequent designations of the type of a genus earlier than 1878 are unlikely. It is possible Hartman (1959) is the first to designate a type (as Iphione ovata), but it is unknown why she did this when I. ovata was often treated as a synonym of the more often reported I. muricata, and it is equally possible she was simply repeating an earlier usage. [details]
|
