| Introduction | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Specimens | | Attributes | | Literature | | Photo gallery | | Stats | | Log in |
Echinoidea name detailsClarkiella Lambert, 1916 †
715467 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:715467)
unaccepted (junior subjective synonym)
Genus
marine,
fossil only
feminine
Lambert, J. (1916). Échinodermes. <em>Revue Critique de Paléozoologie.</em> 20/4: 166-176., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33069430
page(s): 169 [details]
Note Originally included species: Cassidulus...
From editor or global species database
Type species Originally included species: Cassidulus conoideus Clark in Clark & Twitchell, 1915 and Cassidulus hemisphericus Slocom, 1909; Type species designation in Lambert & Thiéry (1921: 369) for the (unnecessary) replacement name Cossmanaster [details]
Fossil range Upper Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous)
Fossil range Upper Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) [details] Status Brief history on the status of Clarkiella 1916 - proposed as new genus for Cassidulus conoideus and C. hemisphericus 1920...
Status Brief history on the status of Clarkiella 1916 - proposed as new genus for Cassidulus conoideus and C. hemisphericus 1920 - erroneously replaced by Cossmanaster due to supposed homonymy with Clarkella Walcott, 1908 [note spelling difference!] 1920-1953 - Cossmanaster treated as accepted genus by all authors 1953 - Cooke clarified the status of Cossmanaster and suggested Clarkiella might prove to be a synonym or subgenus of Hardouinia, but did not formally synonymize the two genera 1962 - Kier placed Clarkiella in the synonymy of Hardouinia 2000 - Smith & Jeffery treat it as subgenus of Hardouinia 2011 - Smith & Kroh treat it as synonym of Lefortia due to similarities in periproct position (which is different in the type species of Hardouinia) [details]
Kroh, A.; Mooi, R. (2024). World Echinoidea Database. Clarkiella Lambert, 1916 †. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/echinoidea/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=715467 on 2024-04-24
Date action by
original description
Lambert, J. (1916). Échinodermes. <em>Revue Critique de Paléozoologie.</em> 20/4: 166-176., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33069430
page(s): 169 [details] basis of record Smith, A. B. & Kroh, A. (eds.). (2011). The Echinoid Directory. World Wide Web electronic publication., available online at http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/echinoid-directory [details] subsequent type designation Lambert, J. & Thiéry, P. (1909-1925). Essai de Nomenclature Raisonnée des Echinides. L. Ferrière, Chaumont. fasc. 1: i-iii, 1-80, pls. 1-2 (March 1909); fasc. 2: 81-160, pls. 3-4 (July 1910); fasc. 3: 161-240, pls. 5-6 (May 1911); fasc. 4: 241-320, pls. 7-8 (March 1914); fasc. 5: 321-384, pl. 9 (Sept. 1921); fasc. 6-7: 385-512, pls. 10-11, 14 (Dec. 1924); fasc. 7-8: 513-607, pls. 12, 13, 15 (Feb. 1925) pp., available online at http://de.scribd.com/doc/17477843/Essai-de-Nomenclature-Raisonnee-des-Echinides#source:facebook page(s): 369; note: under the name Cossmanaster [details] From editor or global species database
Fossil range Upper Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) [details]Status Brief history on the status of Clarkiella 1916 - proposed as new genus for Cassidulus conoideus and C. hemisphericus 1920 - erroneously replaced by Cossmanaster due to supposed homonymy with Clarkella Walcott, 1908 [note spelling difference!] 1920-1953 - Cossmanaster treated as accepted genus by all authors 1953 - Cooke clarified the status of Cossmanaster and suggested Clarkiella might prove to be a synonym or subgenus of Hardouinia, but did not formally synonymize the two genera 1962 - Kier placed Clarkiella in the synonymy of Hardouinia 2000 - Smith & Jeffery treat it as subgenus of Hardouinia 2011 - Smith & Kroh treat it as synonym of Lefortia due to similarities in periproct position (which is different in the type species of Hardouinia) [details] Type species Originally included species: Cassidulus conoideus Clark in Clark & Twitchell, 1915 and Cassidulus hemisphericus Slocom, 1909; Type species designation in Lambert & Thiéry (1921: 369) for the (unnecessary) replacement name Cossmanaster [details] |