Intro 
Species 
Specimens 
Distribution 
Checklist 
Sources 
Log in 

Porifera name details

Carterispongia

1053041  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1053041)

 unaccepted (misspelling of genus name)
Genus

Species Carterispongia clathrata (Carter, 1881) accepted as Carteriospongia clathrata (Carter, 1881) accepted as Hyattella intestinalis (Lamarck, 1814) (misspelling of genus name)
Species Carterispongia foliascens (Pallas, 1766) accepted as Carteriospongia foliascens (Pallas, 1766) accepted as Phyllospongia foliascens (Pallas, 1766) (misspelling of genus name)
Species Carterispongia mantelli (Bowerbank, 1874) accepted as Phyllospongia foliascens (Pallas, 1766) (genus transfer and misspelling of genus name and junior synonym)
Species Carterispongia otahitica (Esper, 1797) accepted as Phyllospongia foliascens (Pallas, 1766) (genus transfer and misspelling of genus name and junior synonym)
Species Carterispongia pennatula sensu Ridley, 1884 accepted as Phyllospongia pennatula (sensu Ridley, 1884) (genus transfer)
Species Carterispongia vermicularis (Lendenfeld, 1889) accepted as Phyllospongia vermicularis Lendenfeld, 1889 (genus transfer)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
feminine
(of Carteriospongia Hyatt, 1877) Hyatt, A. (1877). Revision of the North American Poriferae; with Remarks upon Foreign Species. Part II. <em>Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History.</em> 2: 481-554, pls XV-XVII.
page(s): 540-541 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Nomenclature Ridley (1884), p. 385, adopted Hyatt's (1877) genus Carteriospongia but changed the spelling to Carterispongia without...  
Nomenclature Ridley (1884), p. 385, adopted Hyatt's (1877) genus Carteriospongia but changed the spelling to Carterispongia without explanation. It appears to have been done on purpose because he quotes Hyatt's original spelling correctly. Apparently he was of the opinion that the extra 'o' in the name was redundant. However, this emendation is not allowed as it does not occur in the list of justified emendations of ICZN art. 32.5. Lendenfeld (1889) and Burton (1934) followed Ridley's spelling, but since then the name was used in its original spelling of Hyatt. Thus, there is no prevailing usage We do not here separately explain with each species assigned to the misspelled genus name why these combinations are unaccepted. [details]
Van Soest, R.W.M.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Rützler, K.; de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Hajdu, E.; Pisera, A.B.; Manconi, R.; Schönberg, C.; Klautau, M.; Kelly, M.; Vacelet, J.; Dohrmann, M.; Díaz, M.-C.; Cárdenas, P.; Carballo, J.L.; Ríos, P.; Downey, R.; Morrow, C.C. (2021). World Porifera Database. Carterispongia. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=1053041 on 2021-03-04
Date
action
by
2018-01-01 14:29:21Z
created
2020-12-06 15:54:01Z
changed

original description  (of Carteriospongia Hyatt, 1877) Hyatt, A. (1877). Revision of the North American Poriferae; with Remarks upon Foreign Species. Part II. <em>Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History.</em> 2: 481-554, pls XV-XVII.
page(s): 540-541 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record Ridley, S.O. (1884). Spongiida. <em>Report on the Zoological Collections made in the Indo-Pacific Ocean during the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Alert', 1881-2. (British Museum (Natural History): London).</em> 366-482, pls 39-43; 582-630, pls 53-54.
page(s): 694 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Ridley (1884), p. 385, adopted Hyatt's (1877) genus Carteriospongia but changed the spelling to Carterispongia without explanation. It appears to have been done on purpose because he quotes Hyatt's original spelling correctly. Apparently he was of the opinion that the extra 'o' in the name was redundant. However, this emendation is not allowed as it does not occur in the list of justified emendations of ICZN art. 32.5. Lendenfeld (1889) and Burton (1934) followed Ridley's spelling, but since then the name was used in its original spelling of Hyatt. Thus, there is no prevailing usage We do not here separately explain with each species assigned to the misspelled genus name why these combinations are unaccepted. [details]


Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2021-03-04 · contact: Rob van Soest