Intro 
Species 
Specimens 
Distribution 
Checklist 
Sources 
Log in 

Porifera news

Phylogeny of Antarctic Tetillidae (Tetractinellida) reveals two new genera

Added on 2016-08-25 21:15:51 by Cárdenas, Paco
Carella M, Agell G, Cárdenas P, Uriz MJ (2016) Phylogenetic Reassessment of Antarctic Tetillidae (Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) Reveals New Genera and Genetic Similarity among Morphologically Distinct Species. PLoS ONE 11 (8):e0160718
Species of Tetillidae are distributed worldwide. However, some genera are unresolved and
only a few genera and species of this family have been described from the Antarctic. The
incorporation of 25 new COI and 18S sequences of Antarctic Tetillidae to those used
recently for assessing the genera phylogeny, has allowed us to improve the resolution of
some poorly resolved nodes and to confirm the monophyly of previously identified clades.
Classical genera such as Craniella recovered their traditional diagnosis by moving the Antarctic
Tetilla from Craniella, where they were placed in the previous family phylogeny, to
Antarctotetilla gen. nov. The morphological re-examination of specimens used in the previous
phylogeny and their comparison to the type material revealed misidentifications. The
proposed monotypic new genus Levantinella had uncertain phylogenetic relationships
depending on the gene partition used. Two more clades would require the inclusion of additional
species to be formally established as new genera. The parsimony tree based on morphological
characters and the secondary structure of the 18S (V4 region) almost completely
matched the COI M1-M6 and the COI+18S concatenated phylogenies. Morphological
synapomorphies have been identified for the genera proposed. New 15 28S (D3-D5) and
11 COI I3-M11 partitions were exclusively sequenced for the Antarctic species subset.
Remarkably, species within the Antarctic genera Cinachyra (C. barbata and C. antarctica)
and Antarctotetilla (A. leptoderma, A. grandis, and A. sagitta), which are clearly distinguishable
morphologically, were not genetically differentiated with any of the markers assayed.
Thus, as it has been reported for other Antarctic sponges, both the mitochondrial and
nuclear partitions used did not differentiate species that were well characterized morphologically.
Antarctic Tetillidae offers a rare example of genetically cryptic (with the traditional
markers used for sponges), morphologically distinct species.

Link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0160718



[Overview] [Login]


Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2024-04-24 · contact: Nicole de Voogd