About | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Specimens | Distribution | Checklist | Stats | Log in

Polychaeta name details

Amphiron [misspelling of Amphiro Kinberg]

597649  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:597649)

 unaccepted (lapsus calami by Chamberlin, of no taxonomic significance)
Genus
marine
(of Amphiro Kinberg, 1865) Kinberg, J.G.H. (1865). Annulata nova. <em>Öfversigt af Königlich Vetenskapsakademiens förhandlingar, Stockholm.</em> 21(10): 559-574., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/32289129
page(s): 565 [details]   
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2019). World Polychaeta database. Amphiron [misspelling of Amphiro Kinberg]. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=597649 on 2020-02-23
Date
action
by
2012-05-03 12:08:49Z
created
2019-09-23 21:39:12Z
changed

original description  (of Amphiro Kinberg, 1865) Kinberg, J.G.H. (1865). Annulata nova. <em>Öfversigt af Königlich Vetenskapsakademiens förhandlingar, Stockholm.</em> 21(10): 559-574., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/32289129
page(s): 565 [details]   

basis of record Chamberlin, Ralph V. 1919. The Annelida Polychaeta [Albatross Expeditions]. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 48: 1-514., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ia/memoirsofmuseumo4801harv
page(s): 231, 495 (index); note: misspelling of Amphiro in a key, misspelling repeated in the index. [details]   

additional source Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628.
page(s): 307; note: listing [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Spelling Chamberlin (1919: 231, 495) misspells Amphiro Kinberg in a key as Amphiron, with the misspelling repeated in the index. Both Hartman (1959) and Fauchald (1977) list Amphiron as a misspelling. Chamberlin does not use the name in a species combination, and the error has no taxonomic significance. [details]