Polychaeta name details
original description
(of Terebella edwardsii Quatrefages, 1866) Quatrefages, A. (1866). Histoire naturelle des Annelés marins et d'eau douce. Annélides et Géphyriens. <b>Volume 2.</b>. Première partie. 1-336. Deuxième Partie. 337-794. Explication des planches p.1-24. planches 1-20. Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret. Paris., available online at http://books.google.com/books?id=M_xNAAAAcAAJ page(s): 354, plate 12 bis [= plate 19], fig. 1; note: plate 12 bis [= plate 19] is coloured (not coloured in the copy scanned at BHL ) [details]
taxonomy source
Lavesque, Nicolas; Daffe, Guillemine; Londoño-Mesa, Mario H.; Hutchings, Pat. (2021). Revision of the French Terebellidae sensu stricto (Annelida, Terebelliformia), with descriptions of nine new species. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5038(1): 1-63., available online at https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5038.1 page(s): 11, figure 3; note: description of Brittany and Bay of Biscay specimens. The type is considered lost [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628. [details] Available for editors [request]
redescription
Saint-Joseph, Arthur d'Anthoine de. (1894). Les Annélides polychètes des côtes de Dinard. Troisième Partie. <em>Annales des sciences naturelles, Paris, Série 7.</em> 17: 1-395, plates I-XIII., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35662416 page(s): 186, plate 7-8, figures 207-225; note: A long redescription with figures. Saint-Joseph dropped the double ii, but this is an incorrect subsequent spelling (Code 33.4) [details]
status source
Jirkov, Igor A. (2020). Review of the European Amphitrite (Polychaeta: Terebellidae) with description of two new species. <em>Invertebrate Zoology.</em> 17(4): 311-360., available online at https://kmkjournals.com/journals/Inv_Zool/IZ_Index_Volumes/IZ_17/IZ_17_4_311_360 page(s): 329, figures 12-13; note: alternate representation as Jirkov differs from Choi et al (2020) and does not recognize Neoamphitrite, or mention that usages in Neoamphitrite exist [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
|