Polychaeta taxon details
Anatomus Montfort, 1810 AphiaID: 325094
| Status | | nomen dubium (Described as Mollusca. Indeterminable whether Mollusca or Polychaeta) |
Record status | | Checked by Taxonomic Editor |
| Rank | | Genus |
| Typetaxon | | Anatomus indicus Montfort, 1810 (type by original designation)
|
| Parent | | Polychaeta incertae sedis |
| Sources | |
original description: Montfort P. [Denys de] (1810) Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique des coquilles [...]. Vol. 2: pp. 676 + 16. Paris: Schoelle. , available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11065017 page(s): 279 [details]
basis of record: Fauchald, Kristian (2007). World Register of Polychaeta, available online at http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta [details]
additional source: Adams, A. (1862) On some new species of Scissurellidae from the Seas of China and Japan. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 3, 10, 346–348., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15602946 [details] [full text]
source of synonymy: Mörch, O. A. L. 1863. Revisio critica Serpulidarum. Et Bidrag til Rørormenes Naturhistorie. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, København, Ser. 3, 1: 347-470, pl. 11 [also issued as a separate, 1–124, pl. 11]. , available online at http://www.archive.org/details/naturhistoriskti01copeuoft page(s): 428 [details]
|
Direct child taxa [show all] | | Species Anatomus indicus Montfort, 1810 (nomen dubium)
|
| Environment | | marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial |
| Fossil range | | recent only |
| Notes | |
Nomenclature: Half a century subsequent to Montfort's publication Adams (1862) erected six new species in Mollusca under "Anatomus H. & A. Adams", stating that "By common consent, the somewhat mythical Anatomus of Denys de Montfort has been ignored. His name Anatomus, however, a very significant and good one, may still be used for those species of Scissurella in which the margin of the outer lip is fissured. Woodward has unnecessarily suggested the alteration Anatoma, for the sake, possibly, of the feminine termination." Thus Adams was not creating taxa under Anatomus Montfort, and the original names of the species of "Anatomus" of Adams belong in Mollusca, not Polychaeta. See Anatomus A. Adams in Polychaeta incertae sedis. [details]
Nomenclature: Erected in Mollusca for Anatomus indicus Montfort. It is difficult to ascertain what Montfort was describing, but it is not obviously a polychaete (Montfort in translation "in all respects it can not be counted among the annelid worms") Nevertheless this genus name appears to first enter Polychaeta nomenclature as a synonym of genus Spirorbis Daudin, fide Mörch (1863:428). This placement was reported, but tagged questionable by Hartman (1959). Recently ten Hove & Kupriyanova (2009) placed the genus as invalid, at least in Polychaeta, and referred it to Scissurellidae. However, it is regarded as belonging in spirorbins again by Geiger (2012). Polychaeta Nomen dubium. [details]
|
| LSID | | urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:325094 |
Taxonomic Edit history | |
|
| | | [Taxonomic tree] [Google] [Google scholar] [Google images] |
| | | Citation: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (2013). Anatomus Montfort, 1810. In: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2013) World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2013) World Polychaeta database at http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=325094 on 2013-06-19 |
| | | |
| |