Difference between revisions of "Biodiversity hotspots"
Johnson Mark (talk | contribs) |
Johnson Mark (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{incomplete}} | {{incomplete}} | ||
{{Revision}} | {{Revision}} | ||
| − | The main purpose of describing hotspots is to emphasize spatial variation in the value of [[biodiversity]]. As the locations of [[ | + | The main purpose of describing hotspots is to emphasize spatial variation in the value of [[biodiversity]]. As the locations of biodiversity [[hotspots]] describe areas of relatively high value, they are often used to guide [[conservation]] policy and planning. |
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Defining biodiversity hotspots == | == Defining biodiversity hotspots == | ||
| − | The idea of defining hotspots is generally credited to the ecologist Norman Myers, who suggested that global conservation efforts should be concentrated in areas where there were high numbers of [[endemic]] species and the threat to those species was high. The reasoning behind this approach is that the most cost effective way of reducing species | + | The idea of defining hotspots is generally credited to the ecologist Norman Myers, who suggested that global conservation efforts should be concentrated in areas where there were high numbers of [[endemic]] species and the threat to those species was high. The reasoning behind this approach is that the most cost effective way of reducing species extinctions is to focus resources on saving centres of threatened endemic species. |
=== Other measures for hotspots === | === Other measures for hotspots === | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 13 March 2009
|
|
The main purpose of describing hotspots is to emphasize spatial variation in the value of biodiversity. As the locations of biodiversity hotspots describe areas of relatively high value, they are often used to guide conservation policy and planning.
Contents
Defining biodiversity hotspots
The idea of defining hotspots is generally credited to the ecologist Norman Myers, who suggested that global conservation efforts should be concentrated in areas where there were high numbers of endemic species and the threat to those species was high. The reasoning behind this approach is that the most cost effective way of reducing species extinctions is to focus resources on saving centres of threatened endemic species.
Other measures for hotspots
Global marine hotspot assessments
The hotspots approach advocated by Myers has been applied to coral reefs. Distribution records of 3235 species of fish, coral, snails and lobsters were used to identify 18 centres of endemism. A total of ten of these centres were defined as hotspots as they were at a greater threat of extinction. The ten hotspots were South Japan, the Gulf of Guinea, the North Indian Ocean, Eastern South Africa, Cape Verde Islands, West Caribbean, Red Sea, Philippines, South Mascarene Islands and the Sunda Islands.
Regional and local hotspots
See also
http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/hotspots/Pages/default.aspx
References
Myers, N. 1988 Threatened Biotas: "Hot Spots" in Tropical Forests. The Environmentalist 8, 1–20.
Roberts, C.M. et al. 2002. Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 295, 1280-1284.
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.
|
