Banner
Introduction | Search taxa | Browse taxa | Checklist | Attributes | Stats | Sources | Images | Log in

Foraminifera source details

Parker, S.P. (Ed.) (1982). Synopsis and classification of living organisms. McGraw Hill Book Company: New York, NY (USA). ISBN 0-07-079031-0. 1166, 1232 pp.
1264
Publication
Ant'Phipoda Literature database
Systematics, Taxonomy
Date
action
by
2013-01-12 18:30:12Z
created
db_admin

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorArcellinida (basis of record)
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorForaminiferida accepted as Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorForaminifera (additional source)
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorHaptorida (basis of record)
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorLituoloidea (basis of record)
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorPhaeophyceae (additional source)
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTilopteridales (basis of record)
Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

According to Parker, Hemistasia is an euglenid [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

According to Parker, this family is historically associated with Saprolegniales, but is now thought to be more ... [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor classification

According to Parker, this Genus (Syringoderma) belongs to the Sphacelariales, Sphacelariaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

According to Parker, there is one sole family within the Tecina and that is Thecamoebidae, in which the Platyamoeba ... [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor classification

According to Parker, this family is a part of the Goniotrichales [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Analogous to Dixon [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Analogous to Dixon [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Analogous to Dixon [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Belongs to suborder Eurysporina (together with Chloromyxidae and Parvicapsulidae) [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Belongs to suborder Eurysporina (together with Ceratomyxidae and Parvicapsulidae) [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Belongs to suborder Eurysporina (together with Chloromyxidae and Ceratomyxidae) [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Belongs to suborder Bipolarina (together with Sinuolineidae) [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

is considered the only class within the Euglenophyta by Parker [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Parker (1982) says that Dinophysiales belongs to the Family Dinophysidae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

Protoperidinium is included in Peridiniaceae by Parker [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

This family is not in a seperate order, but is member of Gigartinales [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor classification

This family is not in a seperate order, but is member of Cryptonemiales [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

This family is not in a seperate order, but is a part of the Bangiales [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

This family is not in a seperate order, but is member of Nemaliales [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Classification

This genus is not in a seperate family and order, but is member of Phyllophoraceae, Gigartinales [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Distribution

Cosmopolitan in litoral zones of warm seas [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Spelling

Spelled Bodinidae in the printed version of ERMS [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

According to Parker (1982) Dissodium belongs to the Family Peridiniaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) includes Blepharocysta in the Family Podolampaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) includes the Ordo Prorocentrales in the Subclassis Dinophycidae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) includes the Ordo Pyrocystales in the Subclassis Dinophycidae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) says Amphisolenia belongs to the Family Amphisoleniaceae. [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) says that Histioneis belongs to the Family Dinophysiaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) says that Ornithocercus belongs to the Family Dinophysiaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) says that Heterocapsa belongs to the Family Peridiniaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) says that Oblea belong to the Family Peridiniaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Parker (1982) says that Citharistes belongs to the Family Dinophysiaceae [details]

Unreviewed: has not been verified by a taxonomic editor Taxonomy

Validity of the species doubtful [details]


Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2017-12-14 GMT · contact: Hayward, B.W.