Copepoda taxon details
Pilocamptus monticola (Chappuis, 1936)
715942 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:715942)
accepted
Species
Echinocamptus monticola Chappuis, 1936 · unaccepted
Chappuis, P.A. (1936). Crustacea. III. Copepoda: Harpacticoida. Mission Scientifique de l'Omo. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Nouvelle Série 3(29):245-292. (48-v-1936).
page(s): 273-274, figs. 98-107. [details] Available for editors
page(s): 273-274, figs. 98-107. [details] Available for editors
Type locality contained in Uganda
, Note Chappuis found this species at 7 different...
type locality contained in Uganda [details]
From editor or global species database
Type locality Chappuis found this species at 7 different localities. It seems that he described the species based on specimens from all localities. Thus, all of them should be considered type localities (3 of them are listed here). [details]
Altitude 900 to 4000 m.
Altitude 900 to 4000 m. [details]
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2024). World of Copepods Database. Pilocamptus monticola (Chappuis, 1936). Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=715942 on 2024-04-24
Date
action
by
original description
Chappuis, P.A. (1936). Crustacea. III. Copepoda: Harpacticoida. Mission Scientifique de l'Omo. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Nouvelle Série 3(29):245-292. (48-v-1936).
page(s): 273-274, figs. 98-107. [details] Available for editors
additional source Löffler, H. (1968). Die Crustaceenfauna der Binnengewässer ostafrikanischer Hochberge. Hochgebirgsforschung 1:107-169, pls. 1-8.
page(s): 123-127 [details] Available for editors
page(s): 273-274, figs. 98-107. [details] Available for editors
additional source Löffler, H. (1968). Die Crustaceenfauna der Binnengewässer ostafrikanischer Hochberge. Hochgebirgsforschung 1:107-169, pls. 1-8.
page(s): 123-127 [details] Available for editors
From editor or global species database
Altitude 900 to 4000 m. [details]Type locality Chappuis found this species at 7 different localities. It seems that he described the species based on specimens from all localities. Thus, all of them should be considered type localities (3 of them are listed here). [details]