Copepoda name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorAcartia margalefi Alcaraz, 1976

104258  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:104258)

alternate representation
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Alcaraz, M. (1976). Description of Acartia margalefi, a new species of pelagic copepod, and its relationship with A. clausi. (Descripción de Acartia margalefi, una especie nueva de Copépodo pelagico, y su relación con A. clausi. Investigación Pesquera, Barcelona 40(1):59-74, figs. 1-10, tab. 1. (i-1976) [details]   
Trusted: edited by a thematic editorTaxonomy Vives & Shmeleva (2007, p.425) do not admit...  
Trusted: edited by a thematic editorTaxonomy Vives & Shmeleva (2007, p.425) do not admit the synonymy with Acartia lefevrae, contrary to Bradford-Grieve (1999, p.4).  [details]
Boxshall, G. (2008). Acartia margalefi Alcaraz, 1976. In: Walter, T.C. & Boxshall, G. (2017). World of Copepods database. Accessed at http://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=104258 on 2017-12-15

Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2008-06-27 08:45:14Z
changed

original description Alcaraz, M. (1976). Description of Acartia margalefi, a new species of pelagic copepod, and its relationship with A. clausi. (Descripción de Acartia margalefi, una especie nueva de Copépodo pelagico, y su relación con A. clausi. Investigación Pesquera, Barcelona 40(1):59-74, figs. 1-10, tab. 1. (i-1976) [details]   

basis of record Boxshall, G. (2001). Copepoda (excl. Harpacticoida), in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: pp. 252-268 (look up in IMIS[details]   

additional source Ices Zooplankton: Copepoda. sheet n° 32. [details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien 
 

From regional or thematic species database
Trusted: edited by a thematic editorTaxonomy Vives & Shmeleva (2007, p.425) do not admit the synonymy with Acartia lefevrae, contrary to Bradford-Grieve (1999, p.4).  [details]