WoRMS taxon details

Falcaustra Lane, 1915

991227  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:991227)

accepted
Genus
Dibulbiger Caballero, 1935 · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Florencioia Travassos, 1920 · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Nematoxynema Skrjabin & Schikhobalova, 1951 · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Verlariocephalus Singh, 1958 · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Zanclophorus Baylis & Daubney, 1922 · unaccepted > junior subjective synonym (Synonym )

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, fresh, terrestrial
feminine
Not documented
Taxonomy The validity of Falcaustra Lane, 1914, has been in question
almost since its proposal. This genus has often been...  
Taxonomy The validity of Falcaustra Lane, 1914, has been in question
almost since its proposal. This genus has often been considered
a synonym of Spironoura Leidy, 1856. Spironoura as
originally constituted contained 2 species, both briefly described
(Leidy, 1856), Spironoura gracile, type species, from
the stomach of Pseudemys floridana (5Emys serrata) and Spironoura
affine from the large intestine of Terrapene carolina
(5Cistodo carolina). Boulenger (1923) subsequently found S.
affine in T. carolina and redescribed it as Falcaustra chapini.
Chapin (1924) suggested that because F. chapini Boulenger,
1923, was based on 1 of the 2 species originally included in
Spironoura, Falcaustra should become a synonym. Yorke and
Maplestone (1926) agreed and in their compilation all species
originally assigned to Falcaustra were moved to Spironoura;
in addition, Spirura Diesing, 1861, Florencioia Travassos,
1919, and Spectatus Travassos, 1923 were listed as synonyms
of Spironoura. However, Harwood (1932) thought that because
S. gracile was the type and had not been studied, it
would be premature to consider Falcaustra as a synonym of
Spironoura. Freitas and Lent (1941) considered S. gracile a
nomen nudum and proposed the revalidation of Falcaustra
Lane, 1914 and Spectatus Travassos, 1923; all species assigned
to Spironoura were reassigned to Falcaustra with Falcaustra
falcata as type species. Skryabin et al. (1951) did not
accept these assignments and reassigned all species of Falcaustra
to Spironoura. Chabaud and Brygoo (1957) accepted
the assignments of Freitas and Lent (1941) but added Dibulbiger
Caballero, 1935 and Zanclophorus Baylis and Daubney,
1922 as synonyms of Falcaustra. Yamaguti (1961) rejected
these assignments and reestablished Spironoura. However,
Baker (1987) returned to Falcaustra, pointing out that Walton
(1927) in his revision of the Leidy collection showed that the
type species was probably not congeneric with Falcaustra.
Leidy (1856) described the esophagus of Spironoura as pestleform;
the esophagus of Falcaustra is usually described as having
an hourglass-shaped bulb or a spherical isthmus preceding
the bulb. It is perhaps best to continue Baker’s (1987) reasoning
that because the original description of Spironoura is so
inadequate it should be regarded [details]
Nemys eds. (2024). Nemys: World Database of Nematodes. Falcaustra Lane, 1915. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=991227 on 2024-04-20
Date
action
by
2017-05-02 10:32:14Z
created
2020-01-07 11:39:36Z
changed
2020-01-08 11:17:25Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


taxonomy source Bursey, C. R.; Goldberg, S. R.; Siler, C. D.; Brown, R. M. (2020). New Species of Falcaustra (Nematoda: Kathlaniidae) and Other Helminths in Megophrys stejnegeri (Anura: Megophryidae) from Samar Island, Philippines. <em>Comparative Parasitology.</em> 87(1): 4-11., available online at https://doi.org/10.1654/1525-2647-87.1.4 [details]   

taxonomy source Bursey, C. R.; Platt, S. G.; Rainwater, T. R. (2000). Falcaustra kutcheri n. sp. (Nematoda: Kathlaniidae) from Geoemyda yuwonoi (Testudines: Emydidae) from Sulawesi, Indonesia. <em>The Journal of Parasitology.</em> 86(2): 344., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/3284780 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy The validity of Falcaustra Lane, 1914, has been in question
almost since its proposal. This genus has often been considered
a synonym of Spironoura Leidy, 1856. Spironoura as
originally constituted contained 2 species, both briefly described
(Leidy, 1856), Spironoura gracile, type species, from
the stomach of Pseudemys floridana (5Emys serrata) and Spironoura
affine from the large intestine of Terrapene carolina
(5Cistodo carolina). Boulenger (1923) subsequently found S.
affine in T. carolina and redescribed it as Falcaustra chapini.
Chapin (1924) suggested that because F. chapini Boulenger,
1923, was based on 1 of the 2 species originally included in
Spironoura, Falcaustra should become a synonym. Yorke and
Maplestone (1926) agreed and in their compilation all species
originally assigned to Falcaustra were moved to Spironoura;
in addition, Spirura Diesing, 1861, Florencioia Travassos,
1919, and Spectatus Travassos, 1923 were listed as synonyms
of Spironoura. However, Harwood (1932) thought that because
S. gracile was the type and had not been studied, it
would be premature to consider Falcaustra as a synonym of
Spironoura. Freitas and Lent (1941) considered S. gracile a
nomen nudum and proposed the revalidation of Falcaustra
Lane, 1914 and Spectatus Travassos, 1923; all species assigned
to Spironoura were reassigned to Falcaustra with Falcaustra
falcata as type species. Skryabin et al. (1951) did not
accept these assignments and reassigned all species of Falcaustra
to Spironoura. Chabaud and Brygoo (1957) accepted
the assignments of Freitas and Lent (1941) but added Dibulbiger
Caballero, 1935 and Zanclophorus Baylis and Daubney,
1922 as synonyms of Falcaustra. Yamaguti (1961) rejected
these assignments and reestablished Spironoura. However,
Baker (1987) returned to Falcaustra, pointing out that Walton
(1927) in his revision of the Leidy collection showed that the
type species was probably not congeneric with Falcaustra.
Leidy (1856) described the esophagus of Spironoura as pestleform;
the esophagus of Falcaustra is usually described as having
an hourglass-shaped bulb or a spherical isthmus preceding
the bulb. It is perhaps best to continue Baker’s (1987) reasoning
that because the original description of Spironoura is so
inadequate it should be regarded [details]