WoRMS name details
Pseudomonilicaecum Kurochkin & Nikolaeva, 1978
932901 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:932901)
unaccepted (Contains no named species)
Genus
marine
Not documented
Taxonomy A group name for a some juvenile didymozoids. It was originally designated as a genus. According to Pozdnyakov & Gibson...
Taxonomy A group name for a some juvenile didymozoids. It was originally designated as a genus. According to Pozdnyakov & Gibson (2008), this group should be treated as a 'structural type of juvenile' rather than a genus. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Pseudomonilicaecum Kurochkin & Nikolaeva, 1978. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=932901 on 2024-04-19
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
additional source
Villalba-Vasquez, P.J., J. Violante-González, G. Pulido-Flores, S. Monks, A.A. Rojas-Herrera, P. Flores-Rodríguez, C.V. Cayetano, J.L. Rosas-Acevedo & N.G. Santos-Bustos. (2022). Metazoan parasite communities of the Pacific red snapper, Lutjanus peru (Perciformes: Lutjanidae): interannual variations in parasite communities. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96:1-13. Jun 2022., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000335 [details] Available for editors 
[request]
status source Pozdnyakov, S. E.; Gibson, D. I. (2008). Family Didymozoidae Monticelli, 1888. In: Bray, R.A., Gibson, D.I. & Jones, A. [Eds]. <em>Keys to the Trematoda. Volume 3.</em> Wallingford: CAB International and the Natural History Museum. pp. 631–734. [details]
[request] status source Pozdnyakov, S. E.; Gibson, D. I. (2008). Family Didymozoidae Monticelli, 1888. In: Bray, R.A., Gibson, D.I. & Jones, A. [Eds]. <em>Keys to the Trematoda. Volume 3.</em> Wallingford: CAB International and the Natural History Museum. pp. 631–734. [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy A group name for a some juvenile didymozoids. It was originally designated as a genus. According to Pozdnyakov & Gibson (2008), this group should be treated as a 'structural type of juvenile' rather than a genus. [details]
