WoRMS taxon details

Scolelepis (Scolelepis) globosa Wu & Chen, 1964

833972  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:833972)

accepted
Species
Scolelepis (Nerinides) globosa Wu & Chen, 1964 · unaccepted (superseded original subgeneric...)  
superseded original subgeneric combination
Scolelepis (Parascolelepis) globosa Wu & Chen, 1964 · unaccepted (superseded subsequent subgeneric...)  
superseded subsequent subgeneric combination
marine
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomy Maciolek (1987) in a table placed this species in her subgenus Parascolelepis, but Zhou et al 2009 placed it in the nominal...  
Taxonomy Maciolek (1987) in a table placed this species in her subgenus Parascolelepis, but Zhou et al 2009 placed it in the nominal subgenus, Scolelepis. It appears that both these analyses were based on the original description rather than re-examination of material. The species is incompletely known, and only from the original record. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Scolelepis (Scolelepis) globosa Wu & Chen, 1964. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=833972 on 2024-03-19
Date
action
by
2015-02-12 03:58:25Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Scolelepis (Nerinides) globosa Wu & Chen, 1964) Wu, B. L.; Chen, M. (1964). A new species of polychaete worm of the family Spionidae from Chusan Archipelago, East China Sea. <em>Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica.</em> 1(1): 195-198. [details]   

status source Zhou, J.; Ji, W.; Li, X. 2009. A new species of Scolelepis (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from sandy beaches in China, with a review of Chinese Scolelepis species. Zootaxa 2236: 37–49
page(s): 46 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Maciolek (1987) in a table placed this species in her subgenus Parascolelepis, but Zhou et al 2009 placed it in the nominal subgenus, Scolelepis. It appears that both these analyses were based on the original description rather than re-examination of material. The species is incompletely known, and only from the original record. [details]