WoRMS name details

Serpulorbis validus Kuroda & Habe, 1952

732839  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:732839)

nomen nudum
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Kuroda T. & Habe T. 1952. Check list and bibliography of the Recent marine Mollusca of Japan. Leo W. Stach, Tokyo. 210 pp
page(s): 85 [details]   
Status Kuroda & Habe (1952) concluded that Pilsbry had figured two species as Thylacodes medusae and introduced the new name...  
Status Kuroda & Habe (1952) concluded that Pilsbry had figured two species as Thylacodes medusae and introduced the new name Serpulorbis validus for one of the figures. As they gave no description, and Pilsbry did not distinguish between his figures, S. validus fails to comply with I.C.Z.N. (1999) Art. 13.1.1 and is a nomen nudum. In treating this species in 1975, Okutani & Habe misspelled the name as varidus and gave a figure and description, thus introducing the available name Serpulorbus varidus Okutani & Habe. For further discussion, see Bieler & Petit (2011: 67). [details]
MolluscaBase (2018). Serpulorbis validus Kuroda & Habe, 1952. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=732839 on 2018-06-24
Date
action
by
2013-06-27 18:18:23Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Kuroda T. & Habe T. 1952. Check list and bibliography of the Recent marine Mollusca of Japan. Leo W. Stach, Tokyo. 210 pp
page(s): 85 [details]   

status source Bieler, R.; Petit, R. E. (2011). Catalogue of Recent and fossil “worm-snail” taxa of the families Vermetidae, Siliquariidae, and Turritellidae (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). Zootaxa. 2948, 1-103., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/zt02948p103.pdf
page(s): 66 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Status Kuroda & Habe (1952) concluded that Pilsbry had figured two species as Thylacodes medusae and introduced the new name Serpulorbis validus for one of the figures. As they gave no description, and Pilsbry did not distinguish between his figures, S. validus fails to comply with I.C.Z.N. (1999) Art. 13.1.1 and is a nomen nudum. In treating this species in 1975, Okutani & Habe misspelled the name as varidus and gave a figure and description, thus introducing the available name Serpulorbus varidus Okutani & Habe. For further discussion, see Bieler & Petit (2011: 67). [details]