WoRMS name details

Peltodoris crucis (Mörch, 1863) sensu Bergh, 1880

533257  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:533257)

 unaccepted (misapplication)
Species
marine
(of Doris crucis Ørsted in Mörch, 1863) Mörch, O. A. L. (1863). Contributions la faune malacologique des Antilles danoises. <em>Journal de Conchyliologie.</em> 11: 21-43., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15338052
page(s): 33-34 [details]   
Taxonomy Dayrat (2010) places this species in the genus Tayuva Marcus & Marcus, 1967 (type species by original designation: Tayuva...  
Taxonomy Dayrat (2010) places this species in the genus Tayuva Marcus & Marcus, 1967 (type species by original designation: Tayuva ketos Marcus & Marcus, 1967, from Pacific coast of Mexico) on the basis of a synapomorphy “a muscular wall in the distal portion of the reproductive system”. Discodoris lilacina in the current sense (e.g. Valdés, 2002) is indicated as “Tayuva lilacina of tropical Indo-West Pacific”, and several worldwide species currently recognized as valid are subsumed: Tayuva ketos as “Tayuva lilacina of Panamic Eastern Pacific” (contra Valdés, 2002 who holds Tayuva as a synonym of Discodoris and Discodoris ketos (Marcus & Marcus, 1967) as a valid species); Peltodoris hummelincki Marcus & Marcus, 1963 as “Tayuva lilacina of the Caribbean Sea”; Discodoris maculosa Bergh, 1884 as “Tayuva lilacina of the Mediterranean and Eastern European Atlantic”. Dayrat nevertheless acknowledges (p. 78) that “The name T. lilacina, as used here, likely refers to a species complex”. Alternatively these could be treated as valid species under Discodoris, following Valdés' (2002) view. [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Peltodoris crucis (Mörch, 1863) sensu Bergh, 1880. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=533257 on 2021-10-16
Date
action
by
2010-10-15 08:28:27Z
created
2010-10-15 08:54:50Z
checked
2012-04-18 06:54:42Z
changed
2021-07-26 20:24:56Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Doris crucis Ørsted in Mörch, 1863) Mörch, O. A. L. (1863). Contributions la faune malacologique des Antilles danoises. <em>Journal de Conchyliologie.</em> 11: 21-43., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15338052
page(s): 33-34 [details]   

basis of record Bergh, L.S.R. (1880-1887). Nudibranchien. Nachträge und Ergänzungen. In: C. Semper (ed.). <i>Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen. Malacologische Untersuchungen</i>. Band 2, Theil 4. Supp. 1, pp. 1-78, pls A-F [1880]; Supp. 2, pp. 79-128, pls G-H, J-L [1881]; Supp. 3, pp. 129-225, pls M-R [1886]; Supp. 4, pp. 226-289, pls S-V, X-Z, AE [1887]. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14356032
page(s): 42, pl. A fig. 1-2 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Dayrat (2010) places this species in the genus Tayuva Marcus & Marcus, 1967 (type species by original designation: Tayuva ketos Marcus & Marcus, 1967, from Pacific coast of Mexico) on the basis of a synapomorphy “a muscular wall in the distal portion of the reproductive system”. Discodoris lilacina in the current sense (e.g. Valdés, 2002) is indicated as “Tayuva lilacina of tropical Indo-West Pacific”, and several worldwide species currently recognized as valid are subsumed: Tayuva ketos as “Tayuva lilacina of Panamic Eastern Pacific” (contra Valdés, 2002 who holds Tayuva as a synonym of Discodoris and Discodoris ketos (Marcus & Marcus, 1967) as a valid species); Peltodoris hummelincki Marcus & Marcus, 1963 as “Tayuva lilacina of the Caribbean Sea”; Discodoris maculosa Bergh, 1884 as “Tayuva lilacina of the Mediterranean and Eastern European Atlantic”. Dayrat nevertheless acknowledges (p. 78) that “The name T. lilacina, as used here, likely refers to a species complex”. Alternatively these could be treated as valid species under Discodoris, following Valdés' (2002) view. [details]