WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorCardita rufescens Lamarck, 1819

504850  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:504850)

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted
Species
marine
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNomenclature The earlier name Cardita rufescens Lamarck,...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNomenclature The earlier name Cardita rufescens Lamarck, 1819 has been put forward by Huber (2010: 653) as the valid name to be used for this species. However the name Cardita senegalensis Reeve, 1843 is in usage, including in palaeontological literature on Quaternary warm-water fauna, and the provisions of ICZN art. 23.9 may apply. Awaiting either confirmation that the requirements of this article are met, and formal declaration of respectively “nomen oblitum” and “nomen protectum”, or bringing the case to the ICZN, the name in prevailing usage is here maintained as “accepted”.  [details]
Gofas, S.; Huber, M. (2017). Cardita rufescens Lamarck, 1819. In: MolluscaBase (2017). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=504850 on 2017-12-18

Date
action
by
2010-08-18 08:38:17Z
created
2010-09-15 11:43:10Z
checked
2012-03-27 20:24:56Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


basis of record Huber, M. (2010). Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world’s marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. (look up in IMIS[details]   
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorNomenclature The earlier name Cardita rufescens Lamarck, 1819 has been put forward by Huber (2010: 653) as the valid name to be used for this species. However the name Cardita senegalensis Reeve, 1843 is in usage, including in palaeontological literature on Quaternary warm-water fauna, and the provisions of ICZN art. 23.9 may apply. Awaiting either confirmation that the requirements of this article are met, and formal declaration of respectively “nomen oblitum” and “nomen protectum”, or bringing the case to the ICZN, the name in prevailing usage is here maintained as “accepted”.  [details]