WoRMS taxon details

Turritella attenuata Reeve, 1849

446536  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:446536)

accepted
Species
marine
Reeve, L.A. (1849). Monograph of the genus Turritella. In: Conchologia Iconica. vol. 5, pl. 1-11 and unpaginated text. L. Reeve & Co., London. [stated dates: pl. 1-8: May, 1849; 9-11: June 1849]., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8967277
page(s): Pl. 1, sp. 4. [details]   
Nomenclature Reeve (1849; pl. 1, sp. 4) discusses Linnaeus' duplicatus and acutangulus and considers they are of the same species. He...  
Nomenclature Reeve (1849; pl. 1, sp. 4) discusses Linnaeus' duplicatus and acutangulus and considers they are of the same species. He therefore introduces the present name, referring to Turritella acutangula as listed by Deshayes, 1843 (not of Linnaeus, 1758).
Should the two Linnaean taxa prove to be of the same species, then Reeve's name remains accepted, else it should be considered synonymous to Linnaeus' duplicatus[details]
MolluscaBase (2018). Turritella attenuata Reeve, 1849. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=446536 on 2018-02-18
Date
action
by
2010-01-09 14:33:51Z
created
2013-05-31 05:35:14Z
checked
2014-02-04 11:31:10Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Reeve, L.A. (1849). Monograph of the genus Turritella. In: Conchologia Iconica. vol. 5, pl. 1-11 and unpaginated text. L. Reeve & Co., London. [stated dates: pl. 1-8: May, 1849; 9-11: June 1849]., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8967277
page(s): Pl. 1, sp. 4. [details]   
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Reeve (1849; pl. 1, sp. 4) discusses Linnaeus' duplicatus and acutangulus and considers they are of the same species. He therefore introduces the present name, referring to Turritella acutangula as listed by Deshayes, 1843 (not of Linnaeus, 1758).
Should the two Linnaean taxa prove to be of the same species, then Reeve's name remains accepted, else it should be considered synonymous to Linnaeus' duplicatus[details]