WoRMS taxon details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorConus thevenardensis da Motta, 1987

429881  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:429881)

accepted
Species
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorConus (Splinoconus) thevenardensis da Motta, 1987· accepted, alternate representation
marine
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy The status of Conus nielsenae, C. reductaspiralis and C. thevenardensis has been disputed by some authors, but Australian...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy The status of Conus nielsenae, C. reductaspiralis and C. thevenardensis has been disputed by some authors, but Australian specialists generally regard them as distinct. For conservation evaluation, all three are here listed as distinct.  [details]
Bouchet, P. (2011). Conus thevenardensis da Motta, 1987. In: MolluscaBase (2017). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=429881 on 2018-01-21

Date
action
by
2009-11-06 09:41:38Z
created
2009-11-13 10:12:01Z
changed
2011-10-26 14:38:55Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


additional source Filmer R.M. (2001). A Catalogue of Nomenclature and Taxonomy in the Living Conidae 1758 - 1998. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. 388pp. [details]   

status source Wilson, B. (1994) Australian marine shells. Prosobranch gastropods. Vol. 2 Neogastropods. Odyssey Publishing, Kallaroo, Western Australia, 370 pp.  [details]   

basis of record  (ofChecked: verified by a taxonomic editorConus (Splinoconus) thevenardensis da Motta, 1987) Puillandre N., Duda T.F., Meyer C., Olivera B.M. & Bouchet P. (2015). One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails. Journal of Molluscan Studies. 81: 1-23., available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyu055 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy The status of Conus nielsenae, C. reductaspiralis and C. thevenardensis has been disputed by some authors, but Australian specialists generally regard them as distinct. For conservation evaluation, all three are here listed as distinct.  [details]