WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorProtula protensa (not Gmelin, 1791) sensu Philippi, 1844

423968  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:423968)

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Mörch (1863: 359) gives a very interesting...  
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Mörch (1863: 359) gives a very interesting discussion on the confused origins of this taxon! Mörch's discussion is very noteworthy! According to him "Serpula protensa Gmelin" is not a Serpula, but a Teredo or Kuphus. Protula protensa sensu Philippi most probably is the same as P. tubularia (see Mörch 1863: 359). [details]
Read, G.; ten Hove, H. (2016). Protula protensa (not Gmelin, 1791) sensu Philippi, 1844. In: Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2017). World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=423968 on 2017-12-13

Date
action
by
2009-10-16 11:38:29Z
created
2009-10-20 13:23:19Z
changed
2016-10-11 21:52:23Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


new combination reference Grube, A.E. 1850. Die Familien der Anneliden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Berlin, 16(1): 249-364., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/31180#page/257/mode/1up
page(s): 338 [details]   

status source Mörch, O. A. L. (1863). Revisio critica Serpulidarum. Et Bidrag til Rørormenes Naturhistorie. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift. København, Ser. 3, 1: 347-470, pl. 11 [also issued as a separate, 1–124, pl. 11]., available online at http://www.archive.org/details/naturhistoriskti01copeuoft
page(s): 359 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorTaxonomy Mörch (1863: 359) gives a very interesting discussion on the confused origins of this taxon! Mörch's discussion is very noteworthy! According to him "Serpula protensa Gmelin" is not a Serpula, but a Teredo or Kuphus. Protula protensa sensu Philippi most probably is the same as P. tubularia (see Mörch 1863: 359). [details]