WoRMS name details

Pirula investigatoris E. A. Smith, 1894

414661  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:414661)

 unaccepted (Original combination)
Species
marine
recent only
Smith E. A. 1894. Natural history notes from H.M. Indian Marine Survey Steamer ´Investigator´, Commander C.F. Oldham, R.N.-Series II, No. 10. Report upon some Mollusca dredged in the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea. Appendix Annals and Magazine of Natural History (series 6) 14:366-368.
page(s): 367 [details]   
MolluscaBase (2018). Pirula investigatoris E. A. Smith, 1894. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=414661 on 2018-02-19
Date
action
by
2009-09-20 14:01:55Z
created
2010-08-31 03:55:10Z
changed
2013-06-13 14:57:04Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Smith E. A. 1894. Natural history notes from H.M. Indian Marine Survey Steamer ´Investigator´, Commander C.F. Oldham, R.N.-Series II, No. 10. Report upon some Mollusca dredged in the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea. Appendix Annals and Magazine of Natural History (series 6) 14:366-368.
page(s): 367 [details]   

additional source Verhaeghe, M. & Poppe, G.T. (2000) A Conchological Iconography 3: The family Ficidae. Hackenheim: Conchbooks.
page(s): 16 [details]   

additional source Wood-Mason, J.; Alcock, A. (1891). Natural history notes from H.M. Indian marine survey steamer 'Investigator', Commander R.F. Hoskyn, R.N., commanding. No. 21. Note on the results of the last season's deep-sea dredging Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. VII, Sixth series(XXXVII): 1-19 (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 15-16; fig. 2. [details]   
From editor or global species database
Additional information Smith (1894:367) refers to an earlier publication by Wood-Mason & Alcock (1891:15-16) as Sycotypus sp. as well as a (unpublished?) manuscript by the same authors in which they refer to this species as Sycotypus investigatoris [details]

Publication date Varhaeghe & Poppe (2000:16) list this species with authority "E. A. Smith, 1906". However, in the 1906 continuation of his reports, Smith does not mention this species, only Pirula ficoides Lamarck. The actual description took place in an earlier report, published in 1894, also in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History. As Verhaeghe & Poppe list both references in the Bibliography list, it is here assumed that this is a mere confusion between the two biobliographic references. [details]