WoRMS name details

Anadara geissei (Kobelt, 1891)

225162  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:225162)

 unaccepted
Species
marine
Not documented
Nomenclature The earlier name Arca hians Reeve, 1844 has been put forward by Huber (2010: 573) as the valid name to be used for this...  
Nomenclature The earlier name Arca hians Reeve, 1844 has been put forward by Huber (2010: 573) as the valid name to be used for this species. However the name Anadara geissei is in usage and the provisions of ICZN art. 23.9 may apply. Awaiting either confirmation that the requirements of this article are met, and formal declaration of respectively “nomen oblitum” and “nomen protectum”, or bringing the case to the ICZN, the name in prevailing usage should not be discarded  [details]
MolluscaBase (2018). Anadara geissei (Kobelt, 1891). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=225162 on 2018-07-19
Date
action
by
2006-03-20 14:52:56Z
created
2012-02-05 08:49:57Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


basis of record Ardovini, R.; Cossignani, T. (2004). West African seashells (including Azores, Madeira and Canary Is.) = Conchiglie dell'Africa Occidentale (incluse Azzorre, Madeira e Canarie). English-Italian edition. L'Informatore Piceno: Ancona, Italy. ISBN 88-86070-11-X. 319 pp. (look up in IMIS[details]   

source of synonymy Huber, M. (2010). Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world’s marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. (look up in IMIS[details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
 

From editor or global species database
Nomenclature The earlier name Arca hians Reeve, 1844 has been put forward by Huber (2010: 573) as the valid name to be used for this species. However the name Anadara geissei is in usage and the provisions of ICZN art. 23.9 may apply. Awaiting either confirmation that the requirements of this article are met, and formal declaration of respectively “nomen oblitum” and “nomen protectum”, or bringing the case to the ICZN, the name in prevailing usage should not be discarded  [details]