WoRMS name details

Halichondria subdola Bowerbank, 1866

191365  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:191365)

 unaccepted (genus transfer)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Bowerbank, J.S. (1866). A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Volume 2. (Ray Society: London): i-xx, 1-388. , available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1905089
page(s): 247-249 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Holotype  BMNH 1910.1.1.228, geounit Celtic Seas  
Holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.228, geounit Celtic Seas [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Halichondria subdola Bowerbank, 1866. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=191365 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
2005-12-18 15:00:44Z
created
2007-07-28 13:15:49Z
changed
2010-09-28 18:04:23Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Bowerbank, J.S. (1866). A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Volume 2. (Ray Society: London): i-xx, 1-388. , available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1905089
page(s): 247-249 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

additional source Bowerbank, J.S. (1874). A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Volume 3. (Ray Society: London): i-xvii, 1-367, pls I-XCII., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1871265
page(s): 106, Pl. XLIII 14-16; note: illustration of the type-specimen [details]  OpenAccess publication 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.228, geounit Celtic Seas [details]
From editor or global species database
Type specimen The type specimen indication was made confusing by Burton's (1930) redescription. The 1866 Bowerbank type is fragmentary and Burton claimed type status for a more complete specimen described in 1930. Only the Bowerbank material is the holotype, the later material is not. [details]