WoRMS name details
Alcyonium cylindricum Lamarck, 1815
189899 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:189899)
unaccepted > superseded combination
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Lamarck, J.-B. de. (1815 [1814]). Suite des polypiers empâtés. <em>Mémoires du Muséum d'Histoire naturelle, Paris.</em> 1: 69-80, 162-168, 331-340. [details] 
Note Unknown, but assumed to be from the Caribbean
From editor or global species database
Type locality Unknown, but assumed to be from the Caribbean [details]
Taxonomy Topsent (1933) suggested this to be the same species as Schmidtia aulopora Schmidt, 1870, now considered a junior synonym...
Taxonomy Topsent (1933) suggested this to be the same species as Schmidtia aulopora Schmidt, 1870, now considered a junior synonym of Neopetrosia subtriangularis (Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864). If that would be the case then Lamarck's name would have prority, but since Lamarck is uncertain about the origin it appears prudent to retain N. subtriangularis as a valid name. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Alcyonium cylindricum Lamarck, 1815. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=189899 on 2024-04-24
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Lamarck, J.-B. de. (1815 [1814]). Suite des polypiers empâtés. <em>Mémoires du Muséum d'Histoire naturelle, Paris.</em> 1: 69-80, 162-168, 331-340. [details]
basis of record Topsent, E. (1933). Eponges de Lamarck conservées au Muséum de Paris. Fin. <em>Archives du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris.</em> 10: 1-60. [details] Available for editors
[request]
basis of record Topsent, E. (1933). Eponges de Lamarck conservées au Muséum de Paris. Fin. <em>Archives du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris.</em> 10: 1-60. [details] Available for editors
[request] 
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Unknown type MNHN DT 663 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Topsent (1933) suggested this to be the same species as Schmidtia aulopora Schmidt, 1870, now considered a junior synonym of Neopetrosia subtriangularis (Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864). If that would be the case then Lamarck's name would have prority, but since Lamarck is uncertain about the origin it appears prudent to retain N. subtriangularis as a valid name. [details]Type locality Unknown, but assumed to be from the Caribbean [details]
