WoRMS taxon details

Ciocalypta alleni de Laubenfels, 1936

165761  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:165761)

accepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1936). A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. <em>Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication.</em> 467 (Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30) 1-225, pls 1-22.
page(s): 134 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
Taxonomy De Laubenfels (1936: 134), in a remarkably convoluted reasoning, erected this as a replacement name for Spongia cavernosa...  
Taxonomy De Laubenfels (1936: 134), in a remarkably convoluted reasoning, erected this as a replacement name for Spongia cavernosa sensu Lamarck, 1814 (not S. cavernosa Pallas, 1766). At the same time he intended this as a replacement for Ciocalypta penicillus, which would be a junior synonym of Spongia cavernosa = Ciocalypta penicillus as redescribed by Topsent (1930). The obvious choice of a replacement name, if Ciocalypta penicillus and Spongia cavernosa sensu Lamarck were conspecific, would be Ciocalypta penicillus, as the first available juior synonym, and a new name C. alleni would have been totally unnecessary. However, Spongia cavernosa sensu Pallas is mentioned by Lamarck, which means the use of the name by Lamarck is a misapplication, not a homonym. We nevertheles retain here C. alleni as separate from C. penicillus (and other Ciocalypta species), as it is possible that Lamarck's material was not from the Caribbean, but from South Australia, from where many Lamarck specimens originated, and thus conspecificity is unlikely. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Ciocalypta alleni de Laubenfels, 1936. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=165761 on 2024-04-23
Date
action
by
2005-07-10 18:05:41Z
created
db_admin
2007-08-27 15:12:00Z
changed
2017-11-27 12:47:12Z
changed
2021-08-12 09:05:46Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1936). A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. <em>Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication.</em> 467 (Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30) 1-225, pls 1-22.
page(s): 134 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Taxonomy De Laubenfels (1936: 134), in a remarkably convoluted reasoning, erected this as a replacement name for Spongia cavernosa sensu Lamarck, 1814 (not S. cavernosa Pallas, 1766). At the same time he intended this as a replacement for Ciocalypta penicillus, which would be a junior synonym of Spongia cavernosa = Ciocalypta penicillus as redescribed by Topsent (1930). The obvious choice of a replacement name, if Ciocalypta penicillus and Spongia cavernosa sensu Lamarck were conspecific, would be Ciocalypta penicillus, as the first available juior synonym, and a new name C. alleni would have been totally unnecessary. However, Spongia cavernosa sensu Pallas is mentioned by Lamarck, which means the use of the name by Lamarck is a misapplication, not a homonym. We nevertheles retain here C. alleni as separate from C. penicillus (and other Ciocalypta species), as it is possible that Lamarck's material was not from the Caribbean, but from South Australia, from where many Lamarck specimens originated, and thus conspecificity is unlikely. [details]

From other sources
Holotype MNHN [details]