WoRMS taxon details
Sphyrapus Sars, 1882
136201 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:136201)
accepted
Genus
Sphyrapus malleolus Norman & Stebbing, 1886 (type by subsequent designation)
- Species Sphyrapus caribensis Morales-Núñez, Morales-Ruiz & Ardila, 2017
- Species Sphyrapus malleolus Norman & Stebbing, 1886
- Species Sphyrapus meknes Blazewicz-Paszkowycz, Bamber & Cunha, 2011
- Species Sphyrapus anomalus (Sars, 1869) accepted as Pseudosphyrapus anomalus (Sars, 1869) (Synonym)
- Species Sphyrapus dispar Lang, 1968 accepted as Pseudosphyrapus dispar (Lang, 1968) accepted as Kudinopasternakia dispar (Lang, 1968) (synonym)
- Species Sphyrapus malleolus Sars, 1882 (unaccepted > nomen nudum)
- Species Sphyrapus serratus Sars, 1882 accepted as Pseudosphyrapus serratus (Sars, 1882) (Synonym)
- Species Sphyrapus stebbingi Richardson, 1911 accepted as Pseudosphyrapus stebbingi (Richardson, 1911) (synonym)
- Species Sphyrapus tudes Norman & Stebbing, 1886 accepted as Sphyrapoides tudes (Norman & Stebbing, 1886) accepted as Ansphyrapus tudes (Norman & Stebbing, 1886) (synonym)
- Species Sphyrapus tudes Sars, 1882 (unaccepted > nomen nudum)
marine
Sars, G.O. (1882). Revision af gruppen: Isopoda Chelifera med charakteristik af nye herhen hørende arter og slægter. <em>Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab.</em> 7: 1-54., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29996315 [details]
Taxonomy Sphyrapus malleolus was not formally described until 1886 by Norman & Stebbing (it was a nomen nudum when included in...
Taxonomy Sphyrapus malleolus was not formally described until 1886 by Norman & Stebbing (it was a nomen nudum when included in Sphyrapus n.g. by Sars, 1882). Although it was then designated as “type species” in 1886, Sieg, 1983b:109 has argued that the genus was properly described by Sars, 1882a, and that S. anomalus should be the type species. [details]
WoRMS (2024). Sphyrapus Sars, 1882. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=136201 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Sars, G.O. (1882). Revision af gruppen: Isopoda Chelifera med charakteristik af nye herhen hørende arter og slægter. <em>Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab.</em> 7: 1-54., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29996315 [details]
taxonomy source Sars, G.O. (1869). Undersøgelser over Christiania-fjordens Dybvansfauna anstillede paa en i Sommeren 1868 foretagen Zoologisk Reise. <em>Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne.</em> 16: 305-362. (look up in IMIS) [details]
basis of record Bird, G.J. (2001). Tanaidacea. In: Costello, M.J., C.S. Emblow, & R. White (eds.), European Register of Marine Species. A Check-List of the Marine Species in Europe and a Bibliography of Guides to Their Identification. <em>Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 310-315. (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source Anderson, G. (2016). Tanaidacea-- Thirty Years of Scholarship. (Vers. 2.0, Dec., 2016)., available online at http://aquila.usm.edu/tanaids30/3 [details]
taxonomy source Sars, G.O. (1869). Undersøgelser over Christiania-fjordens Dybvansfauna anstillede paa en i Sommeren 1868 foretagen Zoologisk Reise. <em>Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne.</em> 16: 305-362. (look up in IMIS) [details]
basis of record Bird, G.J. (2001). Tanaidacea. In: Costello, M.J., C.S. Emblow, & R. White (eds.), European Register of Marine Species. A Check-List of the Marine Species in Europe and a Bibliography of Guides to Their Identification. <em>Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 310-315. (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source Anderson, G. (2016). Tanaidacea-- Thirty Years of Scholarship. (Vers. 2.0, Dec., 2016)., available online at http://aquila.usm.edu/tanaids30/3 [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Sphyrapus malleolus was not formally described until 1886 by Norman & Stebbing (it was a nomen nudum when included in Sphyrapus n.g. by Sars, 1882). Although it was then designated as “type species” in 1886, Sieg, 1983b:109 has argued that the genus was properly described by Sars, 1882a, and that S. anomalus should be the type species. [details]
