WoRMS name details

Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorVentromma Stechow, 1923

117127  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:117127)

Unaccepted: synonym, or anything that is not accepted unaccepted
Genus
marine
Stechow, E. (1923d). Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete. II. Teil. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere. 47: 29-270.
page(s): 219 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Schuchert, P. (2011). Ventromma Stechow, 1923. In: Schuchert, P. (2017). World Hydrozoa database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=117127 on 2017-12-15

Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2006-09-29 11:38:53Z
changed
Martinez, Olga
2011-03-11 07:10:22Z
checked
2017-10-10 07:09:25Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Stechow, E. (1923d). Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete. II. Teil. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere. 47: 29-270.
page(s): 219 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record van der Land, J.; Vervoort, W.; Cairns, S.D.; Schuchert, P. (2001). Hydrozoa, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: pp. 112-120 (look up in IMIS[details]   

additional source Nomenclator Zoologicus Online. , available online at http://uio.mbl.edu/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details]   

additional source Hayward, P.J.; Ryland, J.S. (Ed.). (1990). The marine fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK. ISBN 0-19-857356-1. 627 pp. (look up in IMIS[details]   
From editor or global species database
Checked: verified by a taxonomic editorValidity Ventromma is still considered as accepted by some authors. However, when considering all known Kirchenpaueria species, there is no morphological gap between Kirchenpaueria and Ventromma, the latter falls within the variation of the former. [details]