WoRMS name details

Loxokalypus pedicellinoides d’Hondt & Gordon, 1999

1026006  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1026006)

nomen dubium
Species
marine
d'Hondt, J.-L.; Gordon, D.P. (1999). Entoproctes et Bryozoaires Cheilostomida (Pseudomalacostegomorpha et Cryptocystomorpha) des campagnes MUSORSTOM autour de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. <em>in: Crosnier, A. (Ed.) Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM 20. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. Série A, Zoologie.</em> 180: 169-251. (look up in IMIS[details]   
Holotype  MNHN MNHN-BRY-16706  
Holotype MNHN MNHN-BRY-16706 [details]
Taxonomy Loxokalypus pedicellinoides is a very problematic species. I have some years ago corresponded with Dennis Gordon and Peter...  
Taxonomy Loxokalypus pedicellinoides is a very problematic species. I have some years ago corresponded with Dennis Gordon and Peter Emschermann about it, and they were both quite uncertain about the identity of the not very good material. The species has of course been described, but whether it is a Loxokalypus is questionable. [details]
WoRMS (2019). Loxokalypus pedicellinoides d’Hondt & Gordon, 1999. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1026006 on 2019-01-18
Date
action
by
2017-08-03 08:28:32Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description d'Hondt, J.-L.; Gordon, D.P. (1999). Entoproctes et Bryozoaires Cheilostomida (Pseudomalacostegomorpha et Cryptocystomorpha) des campagnes MUSORSTOM autour de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. <em>in: Crosnier, A. (Ed.) Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM 20. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. Série A, Zoologie.</em> 180: 169-251. (look up in IMIS[details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
Holotype MNHN MNHN-BRY-16706 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Loxokalypus pedicellinoides is a very problematic species. I have some years ago corresponded with Dennis Gordon and Peter Emschermann about it, and they were both quite uncertain about the identity of the not very good material. The species has of course been described, but whether it is a Loxokalypus is questionable. [details]