World Amphipoda Database - Boeckia nasuta G.O. Sars, 1894

Amphipoda name details

Boeckia nasuta G.O. Sars, 1894

AphiaID

873585 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:873585)

Classification

Status

unaccepted (nomen dubium)

Accepted Name

Boeckia spinosa G.O. Sars, 1894 accepted as Axelboeckia spinosa (G.O. Sars, 1894)

Rank

Species

Parent

Boeckia G.O. Sars, 1894 accepted as Axelboeckia Stebbing, 1899

Orig. name

Boeckia nasuta G.O. Sars, 1894

Environment

~~marine~~, brackish, ~~fresh~~, ~~terrestrial~~

Fossil range

recent only

Original description

Not documented

Taxonomic citation

Horton, T.; Lowry, J.; De Broyer, C.; Bellan-Santini, D.; Coleman, C.O.; Corbari, L.; Costello, M.J.; Daneliya, M.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Fišer, C.; Gasca, R.; Grabowski, M.; Guerra-García, J.M.; Hendrycks, E.; Hughes, L.; Jaume, D.; Jazdzewski, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; King, R.; Krapp-Schickel, T.; LeCroy, S.; Lörz, A.-N.; Mamos, T.; Senna, A.R.; Serejo, C.; Sket, B.; Souza-Filho, J.F.; Tandberg, A.H.; Thomas, J.D.; Thurston, M.; Vader, W.; Väinölä, R.; Vonk, R.; White, K.; Zeidler, W. (2021). World Amphipoda Database. Boeckia nasuta G.O. Sars, 1894. Accessed at: http://marinespecies.org/amphipoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=873585 on 2024-04-18

Taxonomic edit history

Date

action

2016-04-13 14:28:07Z

created

Grabowski, Michal

2021-11-27 14:58:49Z

changed

Horton, Tammy

[taxonomic tree]

basis of record Sars, G.O. (1894). Crustacea caspia. Contributions to the knowledge of the Carcinological Fauna of the Caspian Sea. Part III. Amphipoda. Gammarida. <em>Bulletin de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, (Ser. 5).</em> 1: 179-223, 343-378; 16 pls., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25216479#page/9/mode/1up [details]

Present

Inaccurate

Introduced: alien

Containing type locality

From editor or global species database

Habitat Epigean [details]

Synonymy Besides the species described below [Boeckia spinosa], Dr. Grimm has distinguished 2 otlier species of this genus under the names B. nasuta and B. hystrix. Both these species are, however, founded upon quite immature specimens, the first-named agreeing exactly with young specimens of B. spinosa, as figured PI. II, fig. 10; and the other only differing in the dorsal prominences of the segments being somewhat stronger and elevated to acutely triangular projections. In my opinion both these supposed species ought to be withdrawn, the genus being at present only represented by a single species. [details]